I really should quit reading haphazardly. As a collector it is bad for my financial
health and shelf space. This habit occasionally sparks a willpower failure and
results in the purchase of something totally unexpected. On reflection, it is not the reading itself
that is dangerous but easy access to online book searching while I’m reading. However,
books happen and the postal lady—named Judy, now a close friend--just dropped
off this latest addition. It is I think
a great association item and I imagine long after I’m gone it will assume its
proper place in the book pantheon, perhaps foundationing a future collection
that I would admire but probably couldn’t afford. I’m just glad I got to it first. As formidable English collector Michael
Sadleir said, ”In nature, the bird who gets up earliest catches the most worms,
but in book collecting the prizes fall to birds who know worms when they see
them.”
The
catalyst was a glance at the January 11, 2014 news headline, “Historic Smoking
Report Marks 50th Anniversary.”
“Fifty years ago,
ashtrays seemed to be on every table and desk. Athletes and even Fred Flintstone
endorsed cigarettes in TV commercials. Smoke hung in the air in restaurants,
offices and airplane cabins. More than 42 percent of U.S. adults smoked, and
there was a good chance your doctor was among them.
“In the decades that followed, warning labels were put on cigarette packs, cigarette commercials were banned, taxes were raised and new restrictions were placed on where people could light up.
"It was the
beginning," said Kenneth Warner, a University of Michigan public health
professor who is a leading authority on smoking and health. . .
The AP story went on to tell of the earliest
warnings of cancer linked to smoking issued by various organizations in the
1950s. Cigarette sales were affected
temporarily but the tobacco industry organized a counter-blast that clouded the
issue. Cigarette sales soon rebounded. Finally:
So, I digested this without
inhaling and it was clear the authoritative report, “one of the most important
documents in U.S. public health history,” was the cornerstone of changes that
have resulted in the prevention of eight million American deaths by smoking
according to a recent JAMA study and uncounted
improvements in the quality of life of millions more. That’s pretty damn heady
stuff.
My
second thought went something like this, “I wonder if there are copies of the
report available online? How was it
issued? Is it scarce?”
These
are thoughts far off the beaten path for most of the populace but not for an
adventurous book collector—particularly one with a fetish for the history of
book hunting and a working knowledge of collected subjects and trends.
A brief
digression will provide a framework. The
collecting of important books related to medical history didn’t become a focused
and increasingly pricey subject area in the United States until the early 20th
century. Many of these pioneer collectors were doctors and scientists with a
humanist bent. The most famous include
Harvey Cushing (1869-1939), Edward Streeter (1874-1947), John F. Fulton (1899-1960),
and Herbert M. Evans (1882-1971). Each collected
older printed texts as well as more modern works. This resulted in private libraries of
thousands of volumes representing a wide spectrum of medical history. Their collecting
efforts brought proper recognition to many under-appreciated medical classics
as well as the discovery of overlooked publications. Cushing, Streeter, and
Fulton all had a Yale connection. In a rare
coordinated effort, the three men, along with another collector, Anton Klebs,
placed their books together at Yale to form one of the most formidable medical
libraries in the country. Herbert Evans,
best remembered as a discoverer of Vitamin E, was influenced by Cushing and
English medical collector Sir William Osler.
He worked closely with Los Angeles dealer Jacob Zeitlin and San
Francisco dealer Warren Howell to form multiple collections in the history of
science and medicine over several decades.
As funds and space dwindled each superb collection assembled by Evans
was sold off: partly to private collectors and partly to institutions such as
Princeton, the University of Chicago, Texas and Utah. With biblio-gun reloaded,
Evans would start again, hunting in still fertile and exciting territory.
These
collectors were ahead of the curve and there is no happier place to be for a
committed bibliophile. Many of the books
they discovered and acquired at modest prices are now rarely met with and when
found will dent all but the strongest pocket books.
I
quickly learned that the original GPO report, titled Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon
General of the Public Health Service, typically turned up in wrappers when
offered with starting prices as low as four dollars. Multiple copies were (and are) available. Yet, not a single bookseller description made
even a passing mention of the report’s importance in medical history. Here was a chance to get ahead of the curve. One copy, priced a bit more than the others,
attentioned me. It was a specially bound
in cloth with the recipient’s name, Leonard M. Schuman, stamped on the front
cover. I frisked Schuman electronically
and within a minute was hitting the order key with fervor.
Schuman's specially bound copy |
Dr. Leonard
M. Schuman, professor of epidemiology at the University of Minnesota, was one
of the ten members of the Surgeon General’s advisory committee that drafted the
report. Schuman reportedly wrote a
substantial portion of the final text. Furthermore,
ephemera was laid in—reproduced below. I found a 1988 interview online of Dr.
Schuman by Richard Kluger explaining the creation of the report in unfiltered
detail.
The
committee reviewed over 7,000 scientific articles and called on approximately
150 consultants during the fifteen month process. Schuman recalled the varied personalities of
the committee members: egotistical, quiet, methodical, easy going, some heavy
smokers (like Schuman), but all occasionally agitated with each other as the
tedious process of committee work lumbered forward. Arguments broke out over the key issue of the
strength of the causality between smoking and lung cancer. He says, “Things were threatening to get out
of hand and [committee member] Gene Guthrie passed around the table a little
booklet that parodied the Charlie Brown “Happiness Is….” books then in vogue
and had opened it to a page reading something like, ‘Happiness is when your
brother-in-law, whose virtues your wife constantly and vocally calls to your
attention, contracts the clap.’ A chain
reaction of laughter rippled or snaked around the table as the book was passed
from hand to hand and de-escalated the tension.”
Security
surrounding the committee was tight and the work environment challenging. They met in a sub-basement conference room in
the Library of Medicine in Washington D.C., “inelegant and characterless” but
“very well ventilated” (to get rid of their smoke!), with files overflowing
into the hallway. These files and
records were typically kept under lock and key and an armed guard was stationed
at the entrance of their work area. The
committee members stayed together at a nearby motel and ate meals
together. “We didn’t want anything
divulged to the public prematurely.” This
would have resulted in a waste of time and energy making explanations or
rebuttals to industry attacks. Ironically,
Schuman’s own smoking habit increased to about two and half packs a day as the
tension rose and pressure built to get the report finished.
Laid in photos of Schuman & other committee members smoking during their meetings |
At 10 am
on Jan. 11, 1964, the committee gathered in a large auditorium jammed with TV
reporters, radio broadcasters, newspaper journalists, and photographers,
creating a scene similar to a clamorous presidential press conference. Attorney General Terry fielded most of the
questions. However, a number were
directed at Schuman and the other committee members. He recalled, “It was an overwhelming
situation for us—even though we’d lived with this for fifteen months, not till
then did we feel the momentousness of the occasion—to affect the lives and
health of people all over the world. . .
it was an overwhelming event . . . the sense that this one
element—smoking—was the most important single factor in the generating of
disease worldwide.”
The January 11 news conference with members in attendance |
“I heard
what they said [about the report] on the radio,” she replied. “You’re going to
quit.”
And quit he did—cold turkey with
no excuses. This was a success story
Schuman liked to tell with relish over the years.
A couple of days later he
received a telegram, the author unidentified, but almost certainly from one of
the other committee members: a light-hearted finish to a serious process.
Schuman would live to the
well-ripened age of 92, passing away in 2005, a strong advocate of anti-smoking
efforts until the end.
I slid Schuman’s specially bound copy back onto
my shelves—a smoke free environment, of course—imagining where it might be a
hundred years from now and hoping that my detailed description laid into the
book will serve as a protective talisman on its journey.
Although scientifically correct, this report was the greatest blow to civil liberties since Prohibition, creating a new pariah class and an acceptable "back of the bus" segregation for those who violate the new social mores. Smoking is the exception to this era's embrace of alternate lifestyles, though this particular choice is no more deadly than are others. Ironically, it is the cultivation of tobacco that settled this country and created its initial prosperity. Now the day is not far off when tobacco growers (which includes most of the "foundationing" fathers) will be looked upon with as much disfavor as slaveholders (which also includes most of the "foundationing" fathers). History is, indeed, always in flux, and we can never know from one century to the next who are the heroes and who are the villains.
ReplyDeleteWhen this report first came out, I was a sophomore in high school, and smoking to my heart's content. And I kept on smoking for forty years, graduating from smoking cigarettes to smoking a pipe because I finally thought it unwise to inhale anymore. Now here I am, fifty years after the report, knowing all too well that my heart and my lungs would be more content had I quit smoking sooner.
ReplyDeleteMemo to Manuel: This report was not "the greatest blow to civil liberties since Prohibition." Having to inhale secondhand smoke was and still is the greatest blow to civil liberties.