Wright
Howes (1882-1978), a highly regarded bookseller based in Chicago, is remembered
for his fundamental bibliography on Americana, U.S.IANA. This bibliography of uncommon and rare Americana is
enhanced by Howes’ concise and witty annotations. He was an acknowledged master in the
field. The first edition was published
by R. R. Bowker Company in 1954 under the title U.S.-IANA (1700-1950): A Descriptive Check-List of 11,450 Printed
Sources Relating to Those Parts of Continental North America Now Comprising the
United States. Howes considered the
first edition a work in progress and welcomed input on revisions and
additions. He labored diligently on a definitive
second edition that appeared in 1962.
The first and second editions sold quickly and remain essential for any
book person interested in the subject. I
highly recommend John Blew’s recent article about Wright Howes and his
bibliography in the April 2012 Caxtonian.
(http://www.caxtonclub.org/reading/2012/apr12.pdf).
The reading of Blew’s article was both
enjoyable and vexing—vexing because it reminded me that I had yet to find an
interesting association copy for my collection.
This inspired a search of copies online and I located one that showed
promise. It was the first edition,
listed by a prominent bookseller, and described as having numerous annotations
throughout. I
sent an inquiry to the bookseller asking about any ownership / provenance
markings. An assistant in the shop
replied:
“We
acquired this book from a New York Auction House. Also, there is a name and
address printed in pencil on the front endpaper: "Edward Lazare, 625 East 14th
ST, New York 9, NY". I cannot say for sure if Mr. Lazare is the one who
made the notations and markings.”
Book Hunt success! The book’s owner, Edward J. Lazare (1904-1991)
was himself one of the most highly regarded and formidable bookmen of his
time. He cut his teeth with David
Randall and Jacob Blanck working at Max Harzof’s famous New York City bookshop,
G. A. Baker and Co. Lazare would go on
to become the owner/editor of American
Book Prices Current from the 1940s to 1965.
He utilized his expertise in Americana, for example, when he prepared
the index volume for the Thomas Streeter auction sale catalogue (1969). Lazare’s annotated copy of Howes then would
be an important artifact in American book trade history. I was excited about this most satisfying
association and I ordered the book.
Time crawled and what was only a week seemed
like thrice that. The book arrived, the
package opened, and a book rush that is known to all that play the game. I was getting to know my new acquisition and
I scanned the flyleaf for Lazare’s name and address as indicated in the
bookseller’s email. Oddly, nothing. No notations at all on either the pastedown
or front fly. Lily white, clean as a cloroxed
sock. A small knot in my stomach. I examined the half title, the rear endpaper
and pastedown. Not even a bookseller’s
note. The knot grew tighter. This was either the wrong copy or the
ownership markings including Lazare’s name and address had been erased!
At this point, my book rush had become a
crash and burn. I hastily went through
the rest of the book and found it still intact with many annotations and
markings. All the items with a rarity
rating of “b” or above were marked, typos and errors corrected, and there were scattered
notations regarding specific titles, prices at auction, etc., throughout. Fortunately, I recognized the markings and
handwriting because I have other items from Lazare’s library. It was apparent that he kept the book close
at hand and used it often. But his ownership—his
name and address—were gone! I muttered a
few special occasion obscenities and my wife wondered what was going on. I told her and she too was appalled.
“Email the bookseller, “she said
firmly. “Who knows what other names and provenance they are erasing right this
minute.”
I composed an inquiry:
“Dear
-- I've received the copy--I think--of the Howes title I ordered. It does have some annotations and laid in
material. . . However, there is no address in pencil on the front
endpaper indicating Edward Lazare's copy. Could you guys have another
copy? Or, perhaps, fatefully and horribly, did someone erase the address
before sending it on?”
I received the following answer:
“So
sorry to say that we did erase it when packing it to ship to you. You may
return it and we will refund you in full if it is not what you wanted. It was
not said to keep the inscription by Lazare so it was erased. Simple human error
and I do apologize.”
Jaw
drop. My book blood had reached a hard boil.
My reply:
“To
say I'm shocked by the response below is an understatement. Is it a
regular policy to erase ownership inscriptions? In twenty-five years of
collecting I've never had to request an ownership signature NOT be
erased. I would have thought given my specific inquiry about the book
previous ownership it was obvious the provenance was important. I was
buying it for the provenance. The only saving grace is that Lazare's
handwritten notations are enough to identify the copy as his.
To
put the copy in perspective: the Howes bibliography is one of the most
important Americana references cited. This is a first edition. The
owner, Edward Lazare, was one of the great American bookmen. . . . So, as you
can see this is a very important copy and you guys just erased Lazare's
ownership inscription! Ouch, to say the least. In the literary
field it would be equivalent to erasing Fitzgerald's ownership signature in a
Faulkner title to tidy it up a bit.
I
would definitely recommend ceasing and desisting from erasing provenance
markings of any kind in any books. No one can know who or what will be important
to future owners. You mentioned this book came from a NY auction. Perhaps
there were other Lazare books in the batch. I'd potentially be interested
in them. However, if someone erases the provenance they are lost.
That is enough to make any rare book person's stomach churn and cause some
frightening nightmares.”
I had copied my email to the prominent
owner of the book business as well as the assistant I’d been corresponding with. I received the following reply from him:
“Dear Kurt :
I agree. I didn't realize it was erased and can't fathom why it was.”
I
replied:
“I
knew you understood my point but wanted to copy you on what happened and make
sure it hadn't become a regular practice unbeknownst to the Commander and
Chief.”
He responded:
“I
appreciate it. The troops have been appropriately dressed down.”
My blood’s hard boil had been reduced to
a simmer. The email exchange accomplished
its purpose but frankly left me with an unsatisfactory feeling. I understand that mistakes happen. However, this is a bookseller of the highest
standing whose staff should know such basics. I felt the bookseller could have responded
at greater length with a more concerned attitude. But in the end the book’s the thing and I’ve
already penciled a new note in the front indicating it was Edward Lazare’s
copy, laying in the correspondence above.
I strongly considered writing the note in ink but it just didn’t seem
right.
Wow - I would not have kept such a cool head :) I love these kind of stories - not the erasure part- the USIANA part; Ron keeps bringing stuff out and telling stories ...
ReplyDeletePia
Yikes.
ReplyDeleteThis is an example of what can happen When Worlds Collide.... So, for instance, worker-bees trained in what can often be the antiseptic environment of Modern First Editions (where books are perfect, authorial inscriptions are avoided for all but the most famous or book related of inscribees... in short, any hint of individual personality is eschewed at all costs), serving customers equally obsessed, never learn to hear/see/appreciate the stories that Each and Every Individual Book wants to tell us.
ReplyDeleteNicely put, Joe. Antiseptic book collecting has its consequences.
DeleteHowever, this is a bookseller of the highest standing whose staff should know such basics. I felt the bookseller could have responded at greater length with a more concerned attitude.
ReplyDeleteI strongly agree with your second sentence and reading the first one cannot but wonder why you weren't at least offered a significant discount rather than the standard ability to return.